Pic 1

Archive for June, 2009

Preserving Your Assets – Archival Framing

Wednesday, June 24th, 2009

At the Colour Factory we have been researching archival framing procedures to make sure we can help you find the best ways to store your precious photographs for the future.

As an artist, implementing archival practice not only protects your work and looks great, but also provides a guarantee for collectors. For collectors, we highly recommended you frame your print as soon as possible after purchase to prevent damage from occurring, ensuring it retains and increases in value.

Museum Level Framing is not confined to museums. Artworks that are to be preserved for future generations should be framed to Museum Level, where possible. Processes are intended to be fully reversible up to 35 years, which means that the framed work can be returned to its former state (i.e. prior to framing) at any time, assuming that the artwork is not inherently unstable.

Conservation Level framing gives a high level of protection for your artwork whilst looking good and enabling you to view your framed work to best effect. It should give virtually as high a level of protection as Museum framing. By using conservation quality materials and the best techniques, the framer can give your work protection from physical and mechanical damage, airborne pollution and acids generated by many framing materials. Conservation framing should be good for 20 years in normal conditions. It is recommended that processes should be reversible whenever possible, as the future value of works cannot always be foreseen and work ‘in mint condition’ commands the best secondary market value.

Frame:
* The rebate should be deep enough to hold the glass, thick window mount or fillets, object, thick under mount and back board.

* The molding must be both strong enough and deep enough to support the whole package. An old frame will sometimes need to be modified to meet these criteria.

The Conservation Mount
The conservation mount comprises of a window mount and under mount (sometimes also referred to as a back mount). To provide adequate physical and environmental protection, both boards should be at least 1.3 mm thick. The boards should be hinged along one edge using either a conservation gummed white paper tape or linen tape, (never pressure sensitive tapes).

Illustration 1. Mount Package

Illustration 1. Mount Package

Illustration 2. Pendant Hing ('T-bar')

Illustration 2. Pendant Hinge ('T-bar')

The Mount

As the picture is in direct contact with the mount, the choice of mount board is crucial to protecting framed works of art on paper.

Museum level
For framing valued original works on paper.

* Cotton museum mount board

This is usually solid core, made from 100% cotton fibre – a traditional paper making material, proven stable over hundreds of years. It can be un-buffered (neutral pH) or buffered with an alkali deposit. One source says Mounting photographs are a special case because some types may be affected by alkalinity: they should not therefore come into contact with an alkaline buffered board.

Conservation Level

For framing original works on paper.

* Conservation mount board such as Rising Museum Mounting Board

This refers to board made from chemically purified wood pulp and then alkaline buffered. Like Cotton Museum board, the core and facings must meet certain criteria such as light fastness, pH ranges and quality of lamination adhesives. A buffer is recommended with an alkali deposit (minimum 3% Calcium Carbonate) which prolongs the stability of the board and provides some extra protection in hostile environments.

The Hinges

* The picture should never be stuck down to a backing card. Restriction of movement can be detrimental. Hinges should allow the picture to hang safely; they should be applied to the top edge and adhered to the under mount.

* Adhesives used must be easy to remove at a future date, and must neither stain nor darken with age. The ideal adhesive is freshly made wheat or rice starch paste. Conservators like to use Japanese paper hinges as they are thin pliable and strong.

* Water-soluble conservation gummed white paper mounting tape is acceptable but pressure sensitive archival conservation tapes are not recommended for use directly on the picture.

Glazing

Works on paper need to be mounted clearly away from the glass to allow for air circulation and movement. If the picture is to be ‘close framed’ (without a window mount) it should be held away from the glass. There is a range of glazing materials with different optical properties.

Reducing Light Exposure

* Museum level framing must use UV filtering glass and it should be strongly considered for conservation level. Light exposure has a pronounced effect on paper condition and pigments.

* The harmful effects of light can be reduced by using ultra violet filtering glass or UVA Acrylics. Ideally the glass should have the least amount of radiation below 400nm (invisible UV radiation) and the maximum amount of visible light transmission.

* Perspex™ and Plexiglass™ can be useful because they are lighter and unlikely to break on impact. However, these materials do scratch more easily.

* The mounted picture/glass sandwich can be sealed around the edges with gummed paper to prevent thunder flies or pollution from penetrating the frame.

The Back Board and Final Assembly

Here is the major difference between Museum and Conservation framing. In Museum framing the print must not be attached to the backing board, and will ‘hinged’ in the frame. In Conservation framing the print may be attached to an archival board using an inert adhesive.

For Museum Level framing:
* The back board should be made of a stable, rigid material, such as pH neutral conservation backing board.

* Further protection from migrating acidity can be provided by the insertion of a sheet of Melinex™ (polyester film) or cooking foil between the back mount and back board.

* The air gap should be sealed with a good quality gummed paper tape only. Pressure sensitive tapes fail and leave a sticky residue.
In some cases of Conservation framing, the image is attached so it sits flatly on the backing board. There are a variety of archival materials that can be used including those used in Museum framing.

* Dibond – is a rigid, durable aluminum composite material consisting of two pre-painted sheets of .012-inch aluminum bonded to a solid polyethylene core – a unique composition that makes it approximately one-half the weight of aluminum. This is recommended for mounting large scale prints for its rigidity.

* Kapamount – is a lightweight product made from foam core coated by a thin layer of aluminum, covered by ph neutral mount board.
* An inert polyester adhesive is used to adhere the print to the backing board.

At the Colour Factory we are investigating and implementing these methods and will shortly have a Museum level framed artwork in our foyer for viewing.

Film Photography Vs. Digital Photography

Wednesday, June 24th, 2009

Ok, here we go…let’s discuss the never-ending debate of film versus digital! This post will consider the advantages film and digital photographers have over one another. In this discussion we are more interested in embracing the positive attributes of each medium, rather than listing the disadvantages.

The Colour Factory does recognise that there is no such thing as an all round winner! Which tool suits best, depends greatly on the application, however, for any serious image maker the transition to either medium is inevitable.

Film photography advantages:

* There are a range of effects created by the combination of film types, chemistry, processing and printing that arguably cannot be replicated by the digital process. Photoshop users would disagree (there is software such as Alien Skin that can simulate film). However, analogue materials can create unique artworks that cannot be reproduced. Techniques such as Polaroid transfers, painting on developer, and alternative processes all create ‘one-off’ artworks that may generate a higher value.

* The processes used to create similar effects in analogue and digital are incredibly different, and this is often the contributing factor to why a photographer or artist will choose either medium. Part of the beauty, enjoyment and ‘magic’ of analogue photography is the element of surprise created from the combination of chemical reactions in film, processing and printing. For example, the use of expired film and Holga cameras. It is possible a similar result may be achieved in Photoshop, but it is controlled and planned. Analogue photographers enjoy the spontaneity and element of surprise involved in shooting film, considering this a key creative factor of their work. These artists take pleasure in the tactile materiality of making work and aren’t afraid to get their hands wet.

* Another result relating to the ‘unknown’ element of analogue that artists relish and understand as fundamental to their creativity and learning is the upshot of making mistakes. The many risks and variables involved and the characteristics of the medium can produce interesting and rewarding outcomes. (For example see Tacita Dean’s exhibition currently on show at ACCA). The throw away nature of digital photography and (LCD) screen viewing encourages mistakes not to be viewed properly and subsequently discarded.

*  Being conscious of film costs, especially large format and the nature of the equipment – it takes longer to set up, it can’t be previewed – requires attention to detail; of light readings, angle, direction of models, and so on. This encourages the photographer to concentrate and take less but higher quality photos. This makes editing less time consuming.

* Film cameras are tougher and more reliable; in regard to climatic and environmental factors. Most large format cameras are mechanical and don’t require battery operation. This means that if you are in the wilderness, under extreme climatic conditions you never have to worry about your equipment failing.

* Double exposure is one technique that absolutely cannot be achieved by a digital camera

* Records and reproduces a broader colour range, better at capturing detail, particularly in highlight areas.

* More forgiving of focus and exposure problems

* Permanence -The quality and lifespan of an analogue black and white fibre print cannot be beaten. Film still sets the standard for permanence and does not require technology to be viewed. Film is future proof (it can be re-scanned as technology improves).

* Analogue photography is cheaper. Hardware and accessories are cheaper, more interchangeable, longer lasting and not propriety affected.

* Simplicity – analogue film cameras are simple and easy to use once you understand the principles of photography. You are not distracted or confused by ‘bells and whistles’. The mechanics of analogue cameras are beautiful, cheap and easy to fix. Pull it apart, see and understand how it works.

People may say that analogue is a dying art and won’t be around much longer. This may be the attitude in Australia, but you only have to look to the USA, Europe, Japan and Korea to see that film photography it is still thriving. Even commercially in Europe and the USA, large format cameras are still the standard for advertising and fashion, and artists everywhere use analogue. Yes, diversity of stock is decreasing but there is a resurgence of interest (take Holga cameras for example) and increase in the value of analogue work.

So, don’t be fooled and remember the more demand there is the cheaper and more readily available it gets. Here at the Colour Factory we have 8×10″ film in the fridge from which we can make mural analogue prints in the darkroom up to 1.8m x 10m!

Digital photography advantages:

For commercial purposes digital photography has the advantage with quick turnaround times, easy previewing, greater control, and versatility.

* White balance

* Equipment and accessories are lighter to carry and more compact.

* Memory cards can fit a lot more images than film.

* High Dynamic Range

* Less grain and cleaner, more consistent colour and image quality in a variety of ’speeds’.

* Digital cameras don’t suffer from the reciprocity failure associated with film and long exposures. However, noise can be an issue, and the heat in some sensors may cause discoloration in long exposures.

* Duplicates are the same as the original

* Technical data is tagged on each image

* More shadow detail than film

* Good skin colour rendition

* You can ‘preview’ your image to make sure that you ‘have it’ and check the exposure (histogram).

* Immediate, instant results

* Less susceptible to preprocessing fragility

* More environmentally friendly

* Film speed control. Ease of changing speeds mid-shoot

* Records moving footage as well

* Takes up less storage space than film

An interesting note on resolution is the difference between film and digital on micro levels. A very fine-grain film has grain particles that are about 2 microns in size. A typical DSLR has individual pixels that are about 6 microns in size. However, grain particles are binary. An individual film grain can only be black or not-black, exposed or not exposed. A photo site (pixel), on the other hand, has a range of thousands of brightness levels, because it’s an analog device. Curious isn’t it, that at this level film is binary and digital is analog? This means that it takes a clump of between 30-40 grains of film to represent a full tonal range, while on a sensor each individual pixel can reproduce from hundreds to thousands of tonal levels. So now to test we photograph a resolution chart, which is high-resolution black and white. This gives film an advantage because each grain can record whether or not it sees something. Thus, high-resolution film is going to measure as having higher resolution than digital. However, when shooting ‘life’, film’s theoretical advantage does not have the same result.

The team at the Colour Factory welcomes any feedback you have on the topic.

Photographic Exhibition Melbourne – Ethiopian Time

Wednesday, June 24th, 2009

Ethiopian Time

Fortyfive Downstairs

Tim Handfieldphotographic_exhibitions_melbourne

“In these photographs I hope to capture the feeling that I experienced in the Simien Mountains of Ethiopia, an uncanny sense of recognition, like being in a 19th Century landscape painting.”

The photographic images in this exhibition were printed by the Colour Factory and the team looks forward to joining Tim at his exhibition opening on Tuesday June 30, 5 – 7pm.

Exhibition runs June 30 – July 11.

Photographic fine art printing is just one of the Colour Factory’s many services.

un Magazine 3.1 Launch Party

un Magazine is Melbourne’s leading magazine for contemporary art. Join in the fun of its Issue 3.1 Launch Party at the Builders Arms Hotel in Fitzroy.

Saturday 27 June 2009, 2 – 5pm

Builders Arms Hotel
211 Gertrude Street
Fitzroy

un_magazine_launch_party

Head On Portraiture Prize

Wednesday, June 17th, 2009

Obscura Gallery St. Kilda
14 June-4th July

head_on_photographic_portrait_competition

“…Head On is really the only opportunity to see the best portraiture work the country has to offer”
Good Weekend, April 2007

Head On is one of Australia’s most critically acclaimed photographic portrait competitions and exhibitions reflecting a vibrant diverse cross-section of new and traditional photographic practices. Prizes awarded to three artists’ work for the best Australian contemporary photographic portrait.

Northern Exposure Festival
High St, Northcote
Opening this Friday 19th June, 6pm

Over 30 High St shop fronts in Northcote feature an eclectic mix of window installations and artistic works as part of the Northern Exposure’s festival’s feature event, High Views. The Festival runs from Friday June 19 until Sunday June 21. Come to the official opening outside Northcote Uniting Church, 7pm Friday June 19.

Artist Exhbition Opening Tonight ‘You are the light’

Thursday, June 11th, 2009

You are the light
Counihan Gallery Brunswick
Drew Pettifer

Opening 6-8pm Thursday June 11

image0011

“Drew Pettifer’s confessional photography records and reflects on private moments in the life of the artist. This immersive series explores themes of intimacy, youth and the domestic and the ambiguities that surround these amorphous categories.”

We Were Young
KINGS ARI Gallery 1
Artists: David van Royen, Vivian Cooper Smith and Ian Tippett
5 – 27 June

image003

‘We Were Young’ brings together the work of three photographers, which developed through a series of conversations. The resulting work examines collective undercurrents of fear and expectation prevalent today. It does this by juxtaposing the ordinary next to the imaginary and the calm next to the anxious. ‘We Were Young’ strips away ideology and dogma to lay bare personal and private fears.

Ian Tippett shows young people protected by the cocoon of the ipod, insulated from the ordinary by the fantasy of music. David van Royen makes photographs of metaphorical landscape where fears of mortality and expectations of family overwhelm reality. Vivian Cooper Smith uses light to represent the incursion of the public into the domestic. The subject is seen divided by imaginary and primal fears.

Accurate colour for photographic art prints

Thursday, June 11th, 2009

Accurate colour is important to all photographic artists and critical in achieving the perfect print. From exposing or capturing the image through to printing and installation, minor adjustments of colour can create different emotional and psychological responses. With this in mind – how important is colour temperature in viewing a work of art, and should artists consider this when approving colour tests?

Let’s talk about Kelvin…
Degrees Kelvin (K) is a value for expressing the colour of light. The relationship of colour temperature to colour perception is not obvious due to the remarkable ability of human vision to compensate for wide variations in the spectral distribution of light sources. Tungsten (or incandescent) light gives off a warm, yellow-orange hue (2700K-3300K). Fluorescent cool white light gives off a cyan-green hue (3500K-4000K), daylight fluorescent is the closest to ‘white’ daylight (5000K) with a blue hue and warm white fluorescent has a magenta-orange hue (2700K-3000K). Depending on the time of day, daylight may appear to be different colours. Daylight is 5500K-6500K. Since ‘white’ light covers a broad range of color temperatures, how is our perception of a work of art affected by the choice of illumination? Is there an ideal white light, i.e. is there a preferred colour temperature for viewing works of art and should the artist take this into consideration when printing?

Considering you do not always have control over the type of lighting your photographs will be viewed in, it is difficult to know what colour temperature to print to. A gallery may have tungsten, fluorescent, or a mixture with daylight. You may also want to exhibit the work more than once under different lighting conditions. The general trend in the past has been to print your work to daylight (5000K) as it is ideal in terms of excellent colour rendering. However, museums and collectors will generally exhibit work under tungsten as it is the least damaging to photographs whilst rendering accurate colour, and it is more commonly found in the home.

The ability of light sources to render colour accurately is crucial in museums. The standard measure for this is the colour-rendering index (CRI). Conventionally a CRI of 100 represents daylight. The best source of light in this respect is Tungsten Halogen with a CRI of 99. We are already aware that tungsten halogen is quite different than daylight, so far as it is much stronger in the red-yellow end of the spectrum. However, it does share with daylight a continuous spectrum, which is a key factor in human response to light. The only other light sources in the range of CRI 90-100 are some fluorescent lamps. These do not have continuous spectra (Lux and Kelvin are not continuous). However, they do get reasonably close to the response of the eye. At present Tungsten Halogen is the first choice for lighting museums, with high colour rendering fluorescent second.

photographic_color_temperature

Let’s talk about Lux…
Lux is a measurement of the light intensity falling on a surface. A problem with natural light is that all visible light is not equal. The amount of fading of an artwork caused by a 50 lux of UV filtered daylight is not equal to the amount of damage cause by a 50 lux of filtered UV fluorescent light, and neither is equal to damage caused by 50 lux of UV filtered incandescent light. The more violet and blue the source contains the more damage occurs, since these are the highest energy visible light wavelengths. The higher the colour temperature, the more violet and blue is present. Incandescent has the least. Fluorescent has more then incandescent, but it depends on the colour temperature of the lamp. Daylight has the most, and will cause the most damage even if lux levels are equal.

It is interesting to also note that due to the interaction of the rods and cones in the human eye, the colour of different light temperatures will appear different depending on their intensity. Basically the higher the Kelvin value, the higher the lux needs to be, to appear white to the human eye. It is the amount of light which triggers a larger visual influence of the cones for higher illumination and rods (blue sensitivity) for lower illumination. ie. Daylight and fluorescent needs to have a greater lux then tungsten to appear white.

This reinforces that tungsten is the best choice of light to exhibit and view work under as it has accurate colour rendition, consistent output and the lowest amount of damaging UV rays in the lowest output.

GALLERY LIGHTING:

* 150 lux (or less) is considered o be appropriate for viewing (exhibiting) photographs
* Incandescent (tungsten) is the most archival lighting to view artwork.

The Colour Factory has checked the colour temperature and lux of its lighting, and have the option for you to view your tests and prints under (UV filtered) white daylight fluorescent 5000K, 220 lux and will shortly be offering museum standard tungsten halogen at 2700K, 150 lux.

What’s On – Get your Cheap Flights!

Wednesday, June 3rd, 2009

Louis Porter  – ‘Cheap Flights’

Gallery 2 Centre for Contemporary Photography

Exhibition opening Thursday 4th June 6-8pm

artist_photographic_exhibition

The photographs in Cheap Flights would not make it into many holiday albums, but they are still travel photographs. Taken on various trips between 2005-2008 they examine the more disappointing aspects of travel.
Travel is about expectation. We expect to have an enjoyable holiday; it says so in the brochure.

The majority of travel photographs aim to reaffirm the idea that fun was indeed had; the sunsets beautiful and the locals charming. These mementos serve as homemade propaganda, along with images of weddings and other family events. Cheap Flights embraces the anti-climactic and relishes the fact that there is a little bit of home in every place you go.

The Colour Factory has worked with Louis to create his artist prints for this exhibition and look forward to joining him for the opening this Thursday.

Also on at CCP:
Simon Zoric ‘I know you despise me for not being stronger’
Bianca Hester ‘Fashioning Discontinuities’
Arlo Mountford ‘The Folly’
Catherine Connolly ‘I’d never seen or heard anything so clearly made for me’
Larissa Hjorth ‘CU’

For more information on what’s on in the art world, visit the Colour Factory’s new Facebook fan page here.

Last Call for Photographic Awards Entries!

Photographic_Awards

The Colour Factory and the Centre for Contemporary Photography invite all photographic artists in the first eight years of their practice to enter the fifth CCP/Colour Factory Award for an emerging photographic artist. The winner receives a solo exhibition at CCP from August 7 to 26 September 2009 and photographic fine art printing courtesy of Colour Factory. For an application form click here.

ENTRIES CLOSE JUNE 5 2009.

The judges in 2009 are Contemporary Art Collector Milton Harris, Artist David Rosetzky  and Colour Factory Director Phill Virgo .